Commentary

One bad break and Mickelson's Masters went south

Updated: April 12, 2008, 10:04 PM ET
By Ron Sirak | Golf World

AUGUSTA, Ga. -- Part of the test of major championship golf is an examination of a player's patience. How well can he handle bad shots and, more importantly, bad breaks?

Phil Mickelson faced such an inquisition Saturday at the Masters and couldn't find the right answers. He handled a bad break badly and played his way out of contention.

Mickelson, who got to 6-under-par and two strokes off the lead with a birdie on the second hole, was at 5-under-par and only three strokes back as he played the eighth hole at Augusta National Golf Club. Lefty appeared to lose his focus after his sand wedge approach from 55 yards hit the pin, lost its spin and rolled back 40 feet to the front of the green.

It was an enormously unlucky break. Without hitting the stick, he likely would have had a very makeable birdie putt. But it was exactly the kind of break a player has to handle. Winning majors is all about patience, it's all about keeping your mind in the now and focusing on the shot at hand -- not a shot two holes ago.

Instead of regrouping, Mickelson unraveled. Visibly frustrated, he rolled the 40-footer on No. 8 to four feet, then played that putt as if his mind was back on the wedge shot, missing it badly to fall to 4-under-par for the tournament. At the time, he was tied with Tiger Woods, who had played 14 holes. And at that time, Mickelson was very much in the tournament.

One of the keys to winning, especially in majors, is to put the past in the past as rapidly as possible. Although Mickelson made a few physical mistakes in the third round, they were very few. He was swinging the club beautifully, showing clear evidence of his recent work with instructor extraordinaire Butch Harmon. Lefty's mistakes on this day were mental, not mechanical.

As often happens in golf, bad shots compounded quickly. Mickelson missed from eight feet to bogey No. 10 and missed another 4-footer on the par-3 12th hole and was suddenly at 2-under-par, three strokes behind Woods, who had already finished.

[+] EnlargePhil Mickelson
Andrew Redington/Getty ImagesFour bogeys and a double bogey put Mickelson back in the pack.
But if there is one thing rock solid about Mickelson, it is that he has no quit in him. He is about as resilient as anyone who has ever played the game. The image that comes to mind is of one of the inflatable dolls you punch. They fall to the ground but then pop right back up.

Finally getting his mind and his swing on the same page, Mickelson followed a two-putt birdie on the par-5 13th hole with a 14-footer on No. 14 that got him back to 4-under-par. And when he faced a 5-footer on No. 15 for the turkey -- three birdies in a row -- it seemed as if he were playing his way back into contention.

But when he fanned that 5-footer, his focus once again seemed to go on vacation. He pulled his tee shot on the par-3 16th hole into the back right bunker and faced a touchy shot to a back-right pin. His blast caught the slope and rolled 40 feet down the hill, from where he left it seven feet short and missed for a double-bogey.

The mystery that is Mickelson, and perhaps a perfect explanation of the magical connection he has with his fans, was in full display on the 18th hole. Despite a couple of wild shots, a great wedge ended up six feet from the hole and he saved par to finish off a 75 that left him in a nine-way tie for seventh place, nine strokes behind Immelman's pace-setting 11-under-par 205.

Mickelson went into Saturday's third round tied for third place, three strokes behind Immelman. Perhaps of even greater importance, he was four strokes clear of Woods. But the 68 by Tiger moved him three strokes past Lefty. An even-par 72 would have put Mickelson in a tie with Woods at 211, six strokes behind Immelman.

Six strokes is a lot of ground to make up in a major championship, but it has happened before -- right here in 1996, in fact. Just ask Nick Faldo -- and Greg Norman. If Mickelson had figured out a way to tough out a 72, he'd have the same chance Woods has on Sunday.

Yes, Mickelson would have trailed by six, and yes, there would have been four players in front of him. But there is also one other extremely big yes. None of the top four on the leaderboard has won a major championship. They are sailing into uncharted waters -- for them -- on Sunday.

To win majors, you have to put yourself in position to have a chance to win on Sunday. That's exactly what Woods did Saturday. And that is exactly the opportunity Mickelson allowed to slip away.

It could well be that when Mickelson looks back on this Masters, the first thing that will come to mind is the bad break he got on No. 8 when his approach shot hit the pin. That would be misplacing the blame.

What he should really remember is not the shot but how he reacted to the shot. We can't control what happens to us, but we can control how we react to what happens to us. And that is a huge part of the test of golf -- especially on a stage such as Augusta National, which probes a person as completely as any course in the world.

Ron Sirak is the executive editor of Golf World magazine.

Click here to subscribe to Golf World, the game's No. 1 newsweekly.
Among this week's features:
Local knowledge blog: The latest news and views
Bomb and Gouge: The latest on equipment
• Golf World columnists: Rosaforte | Sirak | Diaz

Ron Sirak is the executive editor of Golf World magazine.