Barry's legal recourse? Just sue it!
Barry Bonds can say whatever he wants about his alleged steroid use, as detailed in an upcoming book -- so far, he's wanted to say very little -- but if Bonds truly believes the assertions are false, he has a legal recourse. Assuming Bonds believes he has been libeled, his best hope to undo the damage is to file a lawsuit against the writers and publisher of "Game of Shadows," say legal experts.
Fans and critics alike are waiting for his next move.Outside The Lines
At ...
Read full story
Barry Bonds and Doping
A grand jury is reportedly hearing evidence about whether Barry Bonds perjured himself during testimony Dec. 4, 2003. Two new books also detail steroids allegations dating to 1998.
• "Game of Shadows" authors subpoenaed
• MLB won't celebrate Bonds passing Ruth
• 'Clear' supplier pleads guilty
• Report: Bonds' trainer subpoenaed
• Perjury convictions difficult
• Feds investigating Bonds for perjury
• Olney: MLB would seize on conviction![]()
• Klosterman: The breaking point
• MLB plans steroid investigation
• Report: Bonds unknowingly used steroids
• Hunter: Bonds victim of racism
• Conte: Book is 'full of outright lies'
• MLB to celebrate if Bonds passes Aaron
• Book alleges Sheffield doped
• Pearlman: Great wasn't enough
• Jackson: Truth is undiscovered
• Gammons: Best, worst of era 
• Wojciechowski: Career is kaput
• Book details doping regimen
• Jones: Steroids and segregation
• Assael: Andro use? | Wrap ![]()
SportsNation
• Vote: Did Barry Bonds perjure himself?
• Rank 'Em: Whom should MLB investigate?
• Vote: Who belongs in Hall of Fame?
ESPN Motion
• Did Bonds commit perjury? 
• How does federal investigation affect BALCO investigation? 
• More trouble for Bonds 
• Cossack explains grand jury process 
• Selig announces inquiry 
• Co-author talks about book 
• Kurkijan on Bonds' legacy 
ESPN Radio
• CNN's Ted Rowlands 
• Jayson Stark 
• Roger Cossack 
• Canseco: Tip of the iceberg

Related content
• Chasing Ruth
You must be signed in to post a comment