Agent: Investigation won't force Bonds to retire
Deep inside their off-the-record hearts, you know the folks who run Major League Baseball just want Barry Bonds to go away.
![]() | |
| Bonds |
But if they thought a full-scale steroid investigation might cause Bonds to vanish into the mist, they'd better think of a good Plan B, because Bonds isn't going anywhere.
This investigation "is not going to cause Barry to retire," his agent, Jeff Borris, told ESPN.com Thursday night. "Barry won't retire until his skills decline to the point where he's not able to play at the highest level. But right now, that's not the case."
It's true that Bonds missed the last week of spring training with elbow issues. It's also true that he went to the plate only 19 times all spring. But that actually puts him way ahead of where he was before his first game last season, Borris said.
"Look at last year," Borris said. "He had three knee surgeries. He had no spring training. He had no rehab assignment. And he still came back and hit five home runs in 14 games.
"And look at what he did in spring training this year. He went 10 for 16 [.625], with four homers -- and a sacrifice bunt [plus two walks]. So obviously, Barry has shown he can still compete at the highest level and be as good as ever."
It would be hard to believe that the MLB investigation headed by George Mitchell isn't gnawing at Bonds off the field. But why, Borris asked, would anyone think it would bother him on the field?
"He's always had the weight of the world on his shoulders," Borris said. "But when he steps on the field, he's got tunnel vision."
Now, more than ever, he may need it -- with a major investigation, two books, the BALCO grand jury and the IRS all kicking his tires. But the bigger the heat in the past, the better he has played baseball. So who knows what he might do this time around?
Borris declined comment on reports that Bonds doesn't intend to cooperate with the Mitchell investigation. However, there have been indications that all the players who have been linked to the BALCO case may decline to speak to baseball's investigators, on the grounds that baseball is interfering in a federal investigation.
Jayson Stark is a senior writer for ESPN.com
- Senior writer for ESPN.com
- 21 years at the Philadelphia Inquirer
- Author of two baseball books
SPONSORED HEADLINES
MORE MLB HEADLINES
- Cabrera hits 3 HRs, but Tigers lose in Texas
- Moore improves to 8-0 as Rays sweep O's
- Phils' Ruiz, Howard to have MRI exams Monday
- Cardinals beat former teammate Lohse again
MOST SENT STORIES ON ESPN.COM
Barry Bonds and Doping
A grand jury is reportedly hearing evidence about whether Barry Bonds perjured himself during testimony Dec. 4, 2003. Two new books also detail steroids allegations dating to 1998.
• "Game of Shadows" authors subpoenaed
• MLB won't celebrate Bonds passing Ruth
• 'Clear' supplier pleads guilty
• Report: Bonds' trainer subpoenaed
• Perjury convictions difficult
• Feds investigating Bonds for perjury
• Olney: MLB would seize on conviction![]()
• Klosterman: The breaking point
• MLB plans steroid investigation
• Report: Bonds unknowingly used steroids
• Hunter: Bonds victim of racism
• Conte: Book is 'full of outright lies'
• MLB to celebrate if Bonds passes Aaron
• Book alleges Sheffield doped
• Pearlman: Great wasn't enough
• Jackson: Truth is undiscovered
• Gammons: Best, worst of era 
• Wojciechowski: Career is kaput
• Book details doping regimen
• Jones: Steroids and segregation
• Assael: Andro use? | Wrap ![]()
SportsNation
• Vote: Did Barry Bonds perjure himself?
• Rank 'Em: Whom should MLB investigate?
• Vote: Who belongs in Hall of Fame?
ESPN Motion
• Did Bonds commit perjury? 
• How does federal investigation affect BALCO investigation? 
• More trouble for Bonds 
• Cossack explains grand jury process 
• Selig announces inquiry 
• Co-author talks about book 
• Kurkijan on Bonds' legacy 
ESPN Radio
• CNN's Ted Rowlands 
• Jayson Stark 
• Roger Cossack 
• Canseco: Tip of the iceberg

Related content
• Chasing Ruth
- Law: First 2013 mock draft
- Bowden: Who's better -- Miller or Harvey?
- Nitkowski: MLB clubs now smarter in Asia
- Karabell: Machado deserves more love
- Szymborski: Astros' quest to catch '62 Mets


