NEW YORK -- The lawyer who led baseball's investigation of
Pete Rose said George Mitchell's failure to release most of the
evidence from his probe on doping in baseball undermined the
credibility of the report.
Mitchell refused a request from The Associated Press to make
public more than 50 documents referenced in footnotes. The former
Senate majority leader also has not released notes from his
interviews with witnesses who implicated Roger Clemens, Andy
Pettitte, Miguel Tejada and others in the use of
"That's ridiculous," chief Rose investigator John Dowd said
Thursday. "That surprises me. I'm sorry to hear that."
When Dowd's 225-page report on Rose's betting was made public in
1989, 84 exhibits accompanied it, including transcripts of
interviews with the Cincinnati Reds manager and his associates. The
report and the exhibits remain readily available at
Mitchell, according to lawyers involved in his probe, did not
create transcripts of interviews. However, aides took notes.
"It's a subject I never talked to George about or his people,"
Dowd said. "They went about it their way. I think the way we did
it was better and stronger. I'm not saying that in a critical way,
I'm just saying it really smoked it out. And now we've got this
problem with Clemens, and I don't know how the hell they sort that
John Clarke Jr., a spokesman for Mitchell, said Mitchell would
not release the documents.
"Other than Senator Mitchell's testimony before congressional
committees, our work has been completed," Clarke said in an e-mail
to the AP. "The documents that you requested in your e-mail were
provided to us for purposes of conducting the investigation and
preparing the report. We suggest that you direct your request for
copies of the documents to the parties who provided them to us."
Most of the documents requested originated from the
commissioner's office. Rob Manfred, baseball's executive vice
president for labor relations, did not respond to several telephone
calls and an e-mail.
Dowd also faulted Clemens, who has been accused by former
trainer Brian McNamee of using human growth hormone and steroids,
for not speaking with Mitchell.
"When Clemens said 'I let McNamee stick me with some vitamin
B-12' or whatever the hell it was, I said, well, you know, that's
interesting, why didn't you go tell Mitchell that?" Dowd said.
"Mitchell, I think, would have given him a fair shake, would have
said, 'OK, the guy injected you, so it looks like McNamee changed
his story a little.' I think the other thing that bothered Mitchell
was he couldn't get any records from the union. I must say, that
that casts a pall on the whole matter."
Clemens' lawyer, Rusty Hardin, said that Clemens thought
Mitchell wanted to speak only about the October 2006 report in the
Los Angeles Times that the pitcher had been included in a federal
agent's affidavit that alleged pitcher Jason Grimsley implicated
players in drug use. When the full affidavit was unsealed last
month, Clemens was not mentioned.
"Roger and his agent both have said if they had known that at
the time that Roger got the invitation that McNamee was talking to
them making these allegations, they would have gone down there in a
split second," Hardin said.
The players' association refused to cooperate with Mitchell,
saying he would not provide players advance knowledge of the
allegations made against them.
The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is
holding two hearings on the report released last month and said
Wednesday it planned to take depositions from Clemens and McNamee,
who told Mitchell he injected Clemens with performance-enhancing
drugs in 1998, 2000 and 2001. The committee also will take
depositions from two of Clemens' former teammates, Pettitte
and Chuck Knoblauch, and Kirk Radomski, the former Mets clubhouse
attendant who has pleaded guilty to drug distribution.
Clemens has denied using performance-enhancing drugs, and before
the Feb. 13 hearing the committee wants to obtain tapes of
conversations with McNamee made by Clemens' legal team. Two
committee staffers declined to comment Thursday on whether the
panel has asked for or will seek evidence gathered by Mitchell.
"I wouldn't for a moment try to decide what Sen. Mitchell ought
to disclose," Hardin said. "I'm more interested in who he talked
to and who he did not talk to to reach his conclusions."
Mitchell's report did include an appendix with photocopies of 91
checks and money orders, most of them sent to Radomski, along with
eight express mail slips and two notes allegedly written by catcher
Paul Lo Duca.
Commissioner Bud Selig repeatedly said Mitchell was independent
of Major League Baseball, but the union and many lawyers for
players argued that was untrue. They cited Mitchell's continuing
role as a director of the Boston Red Sox, his past role as a
director of the Florida Marlins, his participation in Selig's
economic study committee and his tenure as a director and chairman
of The Walt Disney Co., the parent company of baseball broadcast
"Bud's paying the bill. Bud's the client," union leader Donald
Fehr said Wednesday. "It was a report put together by somebody
hired and paid by the clubs and by the commissioner."
Although Rose was a management employee, subject to the power of
the commissioner, players are protected by their collective
bargaining agreement. That limited what Mitchell could do.
"I think Congress is going to be much tougher," Dowd said. "I
think one thing Mitchell did accomplish is he exposed the tip of
the iceberg here about how serious it is. I think he made a
contribution there. I think he did the best he could based on some
of the opposition, the lack of support."