Strength of Schedule - 2008-2009
| 2008-09 NBA RPI Rankings | ||||||||||||
| RNK | TEAM | RPI | W | L | PCT | SOS | PWR | PF | PA | Exp. W-L | Exp. WP | |
| 1 | Indiana | .489 | 36 | 46 | .439 | .506 | 18 | 8617 | 8708 | 37-45 | .457 | |
| 2 | Miami | .509 | 43 | 39 | .524 | .504 | 14 | 8061 | 8040 | 42-40 | .511 | |
| 3 | Memphis | .451 | 24 | 58 | .293 | .504 | 23 | 7698 | 8146 | 23-59 | .282 | |
| 4 | Boston | .567 | 62 | 20 | .756 | .504 | 3 | 8275 | 7659 | 64-18 | .782 | |
| 5 | Washington | .435 | 19 | 63 | .232 | .503 | 27 | 7877 | 8489 | 18-64 | .225 | |
| 6 | LA Clippers | .435 | 19 | 63 | .232 | .502 | 29 | 7799 | 8518 | 16-66 | .189 | |
| 7 | Toronto | .477 | 33 | 49 | .402 | .502 | 20 | 8121 | 8352 | 32-50 | .386 | |
| 8 | Minnesota | .450 | 24 | 58 | .293 | .502 | 26 | 8019 | 8422 | 25-57 | .308 | |
| 9 | Atlanta | .520 | 47 | 35 | .573 | .502 | 12 | 8046 | 7917 | 46-36 | .566 | |
| 10 | Milwaukee | .480 | 34 | 48 | .415 | .502 | 24 | 8142 | 8231 | 37-45 | .455 | |
| 11 | New York | .474 | 32 | 50 | .390 | .502 | 25 | 8627 | 8841 | 33-49 | .400 | |
| 12 | New Orleans | .525 | 49 | 33 | .598 | .500 | 9 | 7857 | 7730 | 46-36 | .567 | |
| 13 | Houston | .537 | 53 | 29 | .646 | .500 | 7 | 8070 | 7742 | 55-27 | .665 | |
| 14 | Detroit | .494 | 39 | 43 | .476 | .500 | 15 | 7727 | 7767 | 39-43 | .479 | |
| 15 | Chicago | .500 | 41 | 41 | .500 | .500 | 11 | 8378 | 8401 | 40-42 | .489 | |
| 16 | Sacramento | .427 | 17 | 65 | .207 | .500 | 30 | 8248 | 8966 | 17-65 | .201 | |
| 17 | Philadelphia | .500 | 41 | 41 | .500 | .500 | 17 | 7987 | 7981 | 41-41 | .503 | |
| 18 | New Jersey | .478 | 34 | 48 | .415 | .499 | 21 | 8044 | 8244 | 33-49 | .400 | |
| 19 | Cleveland | .576 | 66 | 16 | .805 | .499 | 2 | 8223 | 7491 | 68-14 | .823 | |
| 20 | Portland | .539 | 54 | 28 | .659 | .499 | 5 | 8153 | 7715 | 58-24 | .713 | |
| 21 | Denver | .539 | 54 | 28 | .659 | .499 | 6 | 8555 | 8275 | 52-30 | .634 | |
| 22 | Orlando | .554 | 59 | 23 | .720 | .498 | 4 | 8286 | 7737 | 62-20 | .756 | |
| 23 | Oklahoma City | .444 | 23 | 59 | .280 | .498 | 28 | 7952 | 8452 | 22-60 | .268 | |
| 24 | Golden State | .462 | 29 | 53 | .354 | .498 | 22 | 8905 | 9212 | 30-52 | .364 | |
| 25 | Charlotte | .480 | 35 | 47 | .427 | .498 | 19 | 7677 | 7781 | 36-46 | .445 | |
| 26 | Phoenix | .513 | 46 | 36 | .561 | .497 | 16 | 8974 | 8816 | 47-35 | .573 | |
| 27 | Dallas | .525 | 50 | 32 | .610 | .497 | 10 | 8343 | 8181 | 48-34 | .580 | |
| 28 | Utah | .518 | 48 | 34 | .585 | .496 | 13 | 8492 | 8275 | 50-32 | .605 | |
| 29 | LA Lakers | .570 | 65 | 17 | .793 | .496 | 1 | 8768 | 8140 | 63-19 | .773 | |
| 30 | San Antonio | .536 | 54 | 28 | .659 | .496 | 8 | 7958 | 7650 | 54-28 | .657 | |
|
Glossary W: Wins, L: Losses, PCT: Winning percentage, RPI: Relative Power Index+, SOS: Strength of schedule , PWR: ESPN Power Ranking , PF: Points scored, PA: Points allowed, ExW-L: Expected W-L*, ExWP: Expected winning percentage* +The basic formula is 25% team winning percentage, 50% opponents' average winning percentage, and 25% opponents' opponents' average winning percentage. *ExW-L and ExWP are derived the Pythagorean 16.5 Method, the basketball adaptation of Bill James' Pythagorean theorem of baseball: Runs scored ^16.5 / (Runs scored ^16.5 + runs allowed ^16.5). This formula was designed to relate a team's points scored and points allowed to its won-lost record. |