Commentary

Clarkson, Hopkins among D-III schools dabbling in D-I

Originally Published: August 9, 2007
By Chris Preston | Special to ESPN.com

What does it take to be successful at the Division II and III levels? In this four-part series, ESPN.com looks at the role of money, recruiting and fan Web sites at the lower levels.

Every college and university strives for cultural diversity, opening its doors to the best and brightest students from around the world. At Clarkson University, the Division I men's and women's ice hockey programs virtually double as mini foreign exchange programs. Exactly half the players listed on the Golden Knights' 2006-07 men's and women's ice hockey rosters hailed from countries other than the United States.

Clarkson Hockey
AP Photo/Tim RoskeClarkson hockey has had success at the Division I level at hockey, while participating at the Division III level in other sports.

OK, so Clarkson is located just 26 miles south of the Canadian border in Potsdam, N.Y., and 23 of those 24 players were from Canada (the other was from Turku, Finland). But many of those players didn't simply ride their bikes across the border from nearby Ontario and Quebec; several players matriculated to Clarkson from western provinces like Alberta and British Columbia. Furthermore, the American players came from all over the country, from as far as California, Colorado and Illinois.

In other words, Clarkson's only two Division I sports programs recruit from near and far. Because both the men's and women's ice hockey teams are allowed 18 full scholarships under the NCAA's Division I rules, their recruiting budgets enable them to recruit globally and compete with much bigger schools like Boston College, Michigan and Minnesota. That is why, despite an enrollment that hovers around 3,000 students, Clarkson boasts one of the fastest-rising women's ice hockey programs in Division I and a men's hockey team that earned a top seed in last year's NCAA East Regional.

All other Clarkson sports, however, are Division III programs. Unable to offer scholarships and armed with recruiting budgets that pale in comparison to those of the hockey squads, teams like men's basketball and women's volleyball maintain more of a local flavor. Only two players apiece on those teams' 2006-07 rosters were from out of state.

"Our Division III coaches basically recruit key pockets of the [New York State] Thruway," says Clarkson athletic director Steve Yianoukos. "Most of the travel is right down [Interstate] 87. Our Division III student-athlete population more closely follows the population of our student body. In hockey, half the players are from Canada or Europe."

Even for Division III athletes who are offered financial aid packages, those students do not receive more financial help than any other student at Clarkson simply because they play a sport. Most athletes who participate in one (or more) of Clarkson's Division III sports are local and, therefore, would likely have attended the school regardless of whether they played a sport. On the other hand, many of Clarkson's hockey players were once blue-chip, hot-shot recruits who were highly sought after from all corners of the country. Clarkson is a national and international brand name in men's and women's hockey; for all other sports, it's more of an upstate New York brand name.

There are other schools like Clarkson that are predominantly Division III schools but which house one or two Division I programs, including Colorado College, Hartwick, Johns Hopkins, Oneonta State, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Rutgers-Newark and St. Lawrence University. Athletic administrators and coaches at those schools understand the differences between recruiting in the hypercompetitive, scholarship-driven recruiting world of Division I sports and the non-scholarship, locally competitive Division III landscape. (Division II schools, which offer limited scholarships, recruit regionally, branching out more than Division III schools thanks to larger recruiting budgets, but on much less of a national scale than Division I programs.)

But Johns Hopkins athletic director Tom Calder says that some lower-division schools garner so much national recognition for their academics that it gives the sports programs a boost. "Because of how strong we are academically, kids [from all over] want to come to Hopkins," Calder insists. "That makes it easier for our Division III coaches."

Life In The Lower Levels

What does it take to be successful at the Division II and III levels? ESPN.com investigates.

Monday: Grand Valley State, Williams shine
Tuesday: No money, no (booster) problems
Wednesday: Fan sites target niche market
Thursday: Division III sells school, not sport

All those nationally televised appearances Johns Hopkins' Division I men's lacrosse team has made over the years probably haven't hurt from a national recognition standpoint, either. Traditionally one of the premier lacrosse schools in the country, Johns Hopkins helped make this year's Division I national championship game, which aired Memorial Day on ESPN, the most-watched college lacrosse game in history. (Though Hopkins' opponent, Duke, was likely responsible for bringing in most of the casual lacrosse fans as a result of its recent national soap opera.)

Hopkins is consistently in or near the top 10 of the Division III Directors' Cup standings. Its strong academic reputation nationally has undoubtedly helped attract some of the most gifted non-scholarship athletes in the country; but the national exposure its Division I lacrosse program receives has assuredly been a major selling point, as well.

Similarly, the ice hockey programs at Colorado College, Clarkson and St. Lawrence likely contribute in some small way to their schools' national brand names. A kid who chooses to play basketball or soccer at one of those schools probably doesn't do so because they have great Division I hockey programs. But some of those recruits may know the school's name a little better than they would have if the hockey teams played in Division III.

As for the hundreds of other schools that play solely Division III sports, recruiting is all about selling the school before selling the sport. While schools like Amherst College (Mass.), Washington University (Mo.) and Williams College (Mass.) with long histories of athletic success may have more money and resources in their athletic departments than a school like Connecticut College, which doesn't field a football team, in the end all Division III programs are selling the full college experience their schools have to offer.

That's the case for Division I programs, but to a far lesser extent. Able to tempt recruits with the almighty scholarship, D-I programs can sell their athletic reputations first, and the reputations of their schools second. In reality, those who play Division I sports should be called athlete-students. Division III kids are the true student-athletes.

Chris Preston is a staff writer for the Shelburne News and a frequent contributor to Varsity Magazine. He can be reached at ChrisPreston@shelburnenews.com.