Despite calls for ban, NCAA says it can't stop beer ads, fantasy sports


Beer ads will continue to pay for college sports telecasts, and
college fantasy leagues could become the next real moneymaker on
Web sites.

On Thursday, the NCAA's executive committee decided it couldn't
eliminate alcohol advertising, nor could it stop the incorporation of college
sports into the fantasy games and decided, essentially, to retain
the status quo.

"We want to be very conservative with this," committee
chairman Michael Adams said of the beer ads. "Though we don't
think this type of advertising is appropriate [for college sports],
we have tried this once before in this country and it didn't work
very well."

Pressure mounted from many corners of the sports and non-sports
world, pleading with the NCAA to change a policy that allows
networks to sell 60 seconds of commercial time for each hour
they're on the air. Ads can only be sold for beverages containing 6
percent or less of alcohol -- almost exclusively beer -- during the
NCAA's national championships.

The NCAA also requires all beer ads in stadiums or arenas to be
covered during its championships, does not permit the sale of beer,
wine or liquor during the games and has advised its member
institutions to follow the same code.

For some, that's not good enough.

In April more than 100 university presidents wrote to NCAA
president Myles Brand, calling the beer ads that appeared during
the men's basketball tournament "embarrassingly prominent."

A similar number of football and men's basketball coaches -- some
with national-championship pedigrees such as Bobby Bowden, Jim Tressel
and Urban Meyer, and others who have been nearly as successful, such
as John Calipari and Bobby Cremins -- sent their own letter to the
executive committee, urging a gradual ban during the next three

That position was backed by two other letters that were signed
by more than 200 athletic directors and 39 university presidents.

"Alcohol and college sports are a bad mix," the letter said.
"Beer promotion during college sports telecasts undermines the
best interests of higher education and compromises the efforts of
colleges and others to combat sometimes epidemic levels of alcohol
problems on many campuses today."

Joining the call were nine members of the U.S. House of
Representatives, who sent their own letter to Brand on Wednesday.

All four letters were released by the Center for Science in the
Public Interest,

"We find it puzzling that NCAA advertising rules prohibit ads
for cigarettes, other tobacco products, organizations promoting
gambling and alcoholic beverages, yet continue to allow ads for
beverages with alcohol content of 6 percent or less [beer, the top
alcoholic drink of college students]," the letter said. "Given
the devastating problems caused by underage and excessive drinking,
much of it in the form of beer, this policy makes little sense and
flouts the core values of sports and learning."

But the argument fell short as the committee recommended the
current policy remain untouched.

"I think we've taken a very sensible, very rationale, very
conservative approach and we've asked that any company that
advertises [alcohol] during our games continue to include the
message 'drink responsibly' on its ads," Adams said. "I think
we've taken about as a conservative an approach as any sport in the
country. While not everyone agrees 100 percent, I think we
represent what is a good balance in that opinion."

The other hot topic was fantasy games.

During the past two decades, fantasy sports have become synonymous
with most pro leagues. Fantasy players draft their own teams of
real-life players and compete against other owners using those
players' statistics.

Until now, college sports were pretty much exempt.

That changed late last month when CBS Sports, which has an $11
billion television deal with the NCAA, announced it would revamp
its college football game by using individual names and stats
instead of school names and positions.

Because of a ruling handed down by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals in St. Louis and the U.S. Supreme Court's decision not to
hear the case, the NCAA believes all it can do is revise its own

"Our bylaws lump together names, images and likenesses and the
names are being used now, so we'll have to go back and look at
this," Brand said. "We will need to go back and look at our
options. We certainly are not giving up our model of amateurism."

The meeting occurred on the same day the NCAA announced a
federal court had approved its proposed settlement with 12,000
former student-athletes seeking reimbursements for educational
expenses, resume preparation and career counseling.

As part of the deal, the NCAA will create a $10 million fund for
former student-athletes who signed on to the class-action lawsuit.
Those students, who attended college between Feb. 17, 2002, and
Aug. 4, 2008, have three years to file claims with the NCAA.

Current student-athletes can apply for reimbursement from another
$218 million fund, which will be in place through 2012-13.

The committee also upheld a decision to prohibit men's
basketball coaches from attending non-scholastic events, such as
AAU tournaments, during the month of April.