Tigers can win slowdown games, too
Memphis is one of the two most balanced teams in this Final Four (along with Kansas), finishing in the nation's top five in adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency. Much has been made of the Tigers' dribble-drive motion offense and how explosive they can be on that end of the floor, but they also can defend as ferociously as any team in the land.
What we learned from games against comparable foes
Memphis has played three games against teams that are relatively close to the caliber of its Final Four opponents -- home games against Georgetown and Tennessee (the Tigers' only defeat) and the Elite Eight matchup with Texas. They hammered the Hoyas and Horns offensively, breaking the elite 1.20 point-per-possession barrier in both games, and it was that same offense that let them down against the Vols, when the dribble-drive portion degenerated into a flurry of 3s. Defensively, the Tigers were pretty consistent in all three games and performed well enough to win all three. Only Georgetown (1.02) even scored a point per possession.
Memphis' Big Picture
|Tempo||Offense PPP||Defense PPP|
|vs. RPI Top 50 Average||69.7||1.08||0.95|
|vs. RPI Top 50 Median||69.0||1.13||0.98|
Looking at the Tigers' performance against all RPI top 50 opponents, both trends hold. Since the hard-to-watch overtime win over USC at Madison Square Garden in early December, Memphis has played seven games against top 50 teams and averaged 1.17 PPP on offense. Defensively, only four of the Tigers' 10 top-50 opponents broke the point-per-possession plateau, and only one of those four -- Mississippi State in the second round of the NCAAs -- did so in a game that was legitimately in doubt down the stretch. Though Memphis didn't play a road game against an opponent of this caliber, six of those 10 games were played at neutral sites, so this isn't a product of home cooking, either.
Bottom line: Ignore all the talk about how Conference USA softens the quality of the Tigers' overall performance and 37-1 record. They consistently showed against the best teams they played that they were very good at both ends of the court.
What we learned from losses/close calls
Yes, Kevin Love is the best offensive post man Memphis will have seen this season, but the Tigers' closest calls all seem to have been triggered by big performances from opposing guards. JaJuan Smith and J.P. Prince were instrumental in the Vols' win. Memphis escaped UAB with a one-point win despite 27 points from Robert Vaden. The Tigers were taken into the final minute by UTEP thanks to 27 points from Stefon Jackson. The USC win was ugly, but O.J. Mayo still scored 16 points. In the close win over Mississippi State, the Tigers ate a 21-point, 11-rebound and 5-assist performance from Jamont Gordon.
The other consistent issue (besides the free-throw shooting that helped cost the Tennessee game) was that Memphis shot an unusually high number of 3s in these games, and often at a very poor rate. The Tigers ended up 8-for-27 against the Vols, 1-for-17 against UTEP and 5-for-22 against USC. Chris Douglas-Roberts makes 41.6 percent of his 3s, but the team's three primary shooters -- Doneal Mack, Willie Kemp and Antonio Anderson are all 37 percent or worse. Getting to the rim is the better plan.
Trends to note
• The Tennessee loss was the only game in the past seven against RPI top 50 foes in which Memphis scored fewer than 1.09 points per possession. They have shredded three straight quality NCAA teams.
• The battle on the backboards should be fierce. UCLA is seventh in both offensive and defensive rebounding percentage, while the Tigers are 18th on offense and 30th on defense.
• Memphis' big day from the free-throw line against Texas improved the Tigers to the ninth-worst team in the nation. That's more or less irrelevant at this point, though. They just need to be at least passable for two more games.
Interestingly, despite opponents ranging from Georgetown and Michigan State to Arizona and Tennessee, the Tigers' past seven games against top 50 foes had between 66 and 69 possessions. Given UCLA's relatively few offensive options and projecting Memphis' seasonlong capabilities on this game, you figure 65 points might very well be enough to win. Can the Tigers get there? They have had three clunkers this season against resolute defenses, and Ben Howland's crew held the Tigers to 45 points in the Elite Eight two seasons ago. If Derrick Rose can win his individual battles with the UCLA guards, Memphis stands a much better chance of using its depth and length inside to eventually wear down the Bruins and hurt them like other opposing frontcourts have at times.
This season, UCLA saw opponents take fewer 3s as a percentage of their total shots than all but 36 teams in the nation, and the Bruins defend the 3 very well (32.9 percent allowed). The Tigers don't fare as well when they get jump-shot happy, so a perimeter-based game suggests a lower-scoring game, which suits the Bruins. Defensively, Memphis should make sure that Josh Shipp doesn't find anything easy early. If he remains in his shooting slumber, UCLA will need to get extremely good games from Love, Collison and Westbrook to score enough points to win.
[Editor's note: Season stats and rankings courtesy of kenpom.com]
Andy Glockner is a regular contributor to ESPN.com's college basketball coverage and is the host of the ESPNU College Basketball Insider podcast. He can be reached at email@example.com.
MORE MEN'S COLLEGE BASKETBALL HEADLINES
- No. 7 Duke regroups to escape vs. Clemson
- Iowa State ousts Kansas in Big 12 semifinals
- Syracuse falls to NC State in ACC quarters
- Napier, UConn fend off Cincy to reach final
MOST SENT STORIES ON ESPN.COM
NCAA Tournament 2008
Get caught up with all the news, notes, insights and analysis from the 2008 NCAA tournament.
Bracket• Updated Bracket | Tourney Challenge
Championship Analysis• Forde: Chalmers fulfills promise
• Wojciechowski: Self's big-bucks decision on OSU
• Katz: Memphis pays for free throws
• O'Neil: Collins makes heroics possible
• ATR: Quite a collection of talent in title game
Final Four Analysis• Experts: Who has the edge in the title game?
• Forde: Self on a wild ride, and it's just starting
• Wojciechowski: A quieter Joey Dorsey reflects
• Griffin: Rush thrives after knee injury
• O'Neil: CDR, Rose fuel Tigers' machine
• Katz: Calipari has chance for vindication
• Wojciechowski: Final Four duds
• ATR: End of the road for Love, Hansbrough?
• Forde: Good Kansas throttles UNC
• Katz: Williams takes blame for stunning UNC loss
• O'Neil: Rose leads Memphis to title game
• Wojciechowski: Power-packed Final Four
• Forde: One-and-dones hardly an academic issue
• O'Neil: Not Memphis vs. the world? Yeah, right
• Katz: KU ready for Arthur's breakout game
• Low: Don't forget about UNC's "other" guys
• Griffin: UCLA needs Shipp to shoot straight
• Forde: Williams torn between KU and UNC
• Expert picks: Who wins it all?
• Gottlieb: Rose vs. Collison matchup pivotal
• Fraschilla: Breaking down Kansas-UNC
• Glockner: Which Kansas team shows up?
• Griffin: Calipari battles for repsect
• Glockner: Memphis can win slowdown games, too
• Schlabach: Recent Final Four flameouts
• O'Neil: Collison a key point for the Bruins
• Glockner: Can UCLA's offense be more efficient?
• Katz: Lawson's injury may have helped UNC
• Glockner: Can UNC's defense hold up?
• Forde: Power prevails as Elite becomes Four
• Bilas: Tourney has "Wowed" so far
• Katz: Four unique stories shape Final Four
Video• Bill Self among KU coaching greats
• Kansas on being national champions
• Calipari: Costly mistakes down the stretch
• Chris Douglas-Roberts on Memphis' loss
• Bob Knight on Memphis' loss to KU
• Memphis gearing up to face Kansas
• Memphis, KU to meet for title
• Analysis: Kansas' win over North Carolina
• Analysis: Memphis' win over UCLA
• All the coaches talk Final Four
• Davidson's McKillop previews Final Four
• Who Are These Guys: Memphis
• Final Four Sitdown: Roy Williams
• Final Four Sitdown: Bill Self
• Final Four Sitdown: John Calipari
• Final Four Sitdown: Ben Howland
• Katz: Small window for UCLA, Memphis
• Vitale: Previews Final Four matchups
• Bilas: Likes the look of the Final Four
• Gottlieb: All No. 1 seeds reach Final Four
Audio• Bill Self on the title and Oklahoma State
• Podcast: Gottlieb on Kansas' national title
• Podcast: Gottlieb on title game X factors
• Roy Williams on Final Four return
• Podcast: Katz on Final Four coaches
• Bill Self talks Davidson game, Final Four
• Podcast: Gottlieb talks Final Four, Davidson
Photos• Championship game photo gallery
• Final Four photo gallery
• Elite Eight Day 2 photo gallery
• Elite Eight Day 1 photo gallery
• Sweet 16 Day 2 photo gallery
• Sweet 16 Day 1 photo gallery
• Day 4 photo gallery
• Day 3 photo gallery
• Day 2 photo gallery
• Day 1 photo gallery
NC State's 25th anniversary• Dinich: From star to one minute in title game
• Dinich: Kay Yow still fighting Valvano's fight
• Bob Valvano remembers brother's team
More• Rank the last 10 national champions
• Rank Chalmers' 3 vs. other big-time shots
• Vote: Memphis vs. Kansas for the title
• Vote: Which team will win it all?
• Vote: Test your Final Four team knowledge
• Tournament Challenge | Bracket Master
• Insider tourney guide | BracketCaster