Chargers have most rookie money
In the wake of the strange juxtaposition of Eli Manning and Philip Rivers during the first hour of the draft on Saturday, people wondered which of the prospects in the unparalleled swap of highly-regarded quarterbacks would eventually sign the more lucrative contract.
| Rookie money |
|---|
|
Here is a look at the rookie pool allocations, the maximum amount of salary cap space that each team can spend on its draft choices and undrafted free agents in 2004, for the 32 NFL franchises: 1. San Diego . . . $6,024,776 2. Oakland . . . $5,170,440 3. Jacksonville . . . $5,050,059 4. Arizona . . . $4,706,896 5. Tennessee . . . $4,702,937 6. Cincinnati . . . $4,639,928 7. Detroit . . . $4,580,926 8. Houston . . . $4,449,138 9. N.Y. Giants . . . $4,370,100 10. Atlanta . . . $4,329,933 11. Denver . . . $4,296,669 12. San Francisco . . . $4,143,162 13. New England . . . $4,130,090 14. N.Y. Jets . . . $3,999,265 15. Pittsburgh . . . $3,904,326 16. Philadelphia . . . $3,748,154 17. Chicago . . . $3,738,616 18. Buffalo . . . $3,640,573 19. Cleveland . . . $3,612,999 20. Minnesota . . . $3,538,788 21. Tampa Bay . . . $3,289,627 22. Indianapolis . . . $3,129,590 23. Seattle . . . $3,106,600 24. Washington . . . $3,098,865 25. New Orleans . . . $2,960,636 26. Dallas . . . $2,895,414 27. St. Louis . . . $2,763,323 28. Green Bay . . . $2,733,855 29. Kansas City . . . $2,704,631 30. Carolina . . . $2,608,614 31. Miami . . . $2,491,245 32. Baltimore . . . $2,202,960 Total . . . $120,763,185 |
So, a draft in which the first actual player chosen overall does not land the best contract, huh? Hey, after the wackiness that transpired over the weekend, why not?
According to documents obtained by ESPN.com from NFL sources, the Chargers were allocated the most money in the league, $6.024 million, to sign all of their draft picks and undrafted free agents. By contrast, the Giants received a rookie pool allocation of $4.37 million, or about 27.5 percent less than San Diego was awarded.
Despite choosing fourth, in fact, the Giants have just the ninth-highest rookie allocation.
That will make it difficult for Manning, who decided before the draft that he did not want to begin his career with the Chargers, to secure the top deal financially. It could also make for some difficult negotiations once the bargaining commences, since the Manning camp might claim that, despite the subsequent trade to the Giants, who chose fourth overall in the first round, the former Ole Miss star was still the initial prospect off the board.
The top choice in the 2003, quarterback Carson Palmer, received 47.7 percent of the cap room in the Cincinnati Bengals' rookie allocation of $5.238 million. The fourth choice in the 2003 draft, defensive tackle Dewayne Robertson of the New York Jets, got a deal that represented 52.7 percent of his team's rookie pool. But even with a larger percentage of the pool, Robertson landed the lesser deal in terms of hard cash.
Applying those same percentages to this year's rookie pool, which may not necessarily be the case, Rivers could end up with a cap number that is a half-million dollars more than that of Manning, even though he was chosen three slots lower. There are, however, many variables, and this is also a season in which a prospect's signing bonus can be prorated over six years. In the '03 draft, bonuses could be amortized over seven years, a significant difference, and one that will also impact negotiations this spring and summer.
The rookie pool is, essentially, a cap within a cap. A team's rookie pool allocation is part of, not in addition to, its overall spending limit of $81 million.
The formula for deriving each team's rookie allocation is regarded as Byzantine, barely understood by most franchise officials, and is basically a function of how many selections are exercised by a team and where those choices are slotted in a given round. In addition to the top overall choice, for instance, the Chargers made 11 selections, tied for second-most in the league, and that contributed to their high rookie allocation.
Conversely, the Atlanta Falcons made the eighth overall choice in the first round, gained another first-rounder later on, but have just the 10th-largest rookie allocation. Likewise, the Buffalo Bills exercised the 13th overall choice, also secured another first-round pick, and have only the 18th-largest rookie pool.
Tennessee, on the other hand, benefited from a weekend of wheeling and dealing which netted the Titans a league-high 13 choices. The reward for the Titans, who began the draft with the 27th choice, but traded down out of the first round, was a rookie allocation of $4.702 million, the fifth highest in the league.
The lowest rookie pool award went to Baltimore, which did not have a first-round choice, and made just seven selections.
The total rookie pool for 2004 is $120.763 million, or about $3.77 million per franchise. There are 15 teams that received more than the average. As anticipated, the allocation is basically "flat" for a third consecutive year, with an increase of less than two percent over the 2003 rookie pool.
As of Thursday morning, NFL salary documents indicated there was $157.4 million of aggregate cap room available leaguewide.
Len Pasquarelli is a senior writer for ESPN.com.
SPONSORED HEADLINES
MORE NFL HEADLINES
- Report: Hernandez questioned on homicide
- Pats' Gronkowski undergoes back surgery
- Gleason accepts fired radio DJs' apologies
- Johnson: 'I've learned my lesson' from jail
MOST SENT STORIES ON ESPN.COM
EDITORS' PICKS

- Can He Do It Again?
- Russell Wilson is the young QB with the most to prove.
Chadiha »

- Problem Solved?
- Can a pair of rookies improve G.B.'s run game?
Outsiders

- No Ordinary Rookie
- Can Denard Robinson give the Jaguars an edge?
Kuharsky »
ALSO SEE
- Outsiders: Packers run woes done?
- Bowen: How to stop Adrian Peterson
- Schefter: What New York Jets will do at QB
- Kiper: The 5 best offseasons of 2013
- Offseason Grades: AFC | NFC | Kiper on draft

