Report: NFLPA against blood testing for HGH
The NFL Players Association doubts the validity of current testing methods for human growth hormone and says the league does not intend to implement blood testing of its players for HGH, The Washington Post reported Saturday.
NFLPA executive director Gene Upshaw told the newspaper that he and other league leaders doubt the reliability of blood testing first used at the 2004 Athens Olympics.
"What we're doing at this point is reviewing to see about the performance of the test," Upshaw told The Post. "We're not so sure the test works. There's no urine test, and even the blood test is not reliable."
Arizona Diamondbacks pitcher Jason Grimsley admitted to federal investigators that he took human growth hormone, steroids and amphetamines, according to court documents.
According to The Post, growth hormone is on the league's list of banned substances, but there is no reliable urine test for it. Upshaw said he would oppose blood testing of players.
"When you start talking about coming in to take a person's blood, that's different than taking someone's urine," Upshaw told the NFLPA. "I know personally I would have a problem with someone coming in and trying to take the players' blood. I'm not ready to make that leap."
SPONSORED HEADLINES
MORE NFL HEADLINES
- Lawsuit alleged Hernandez shot man in Feb.
- Source: Revis paid $50K to get 24 with Bucs
- Titans' Pollard: Mission to 'kill,' goal is SB
- Arians: Fans biggest obstacle for gay player
MOST SENT STORIES ON ESPN.COM
EDITORS' PICKS

- The Really Big Picture
- Our experts project the 2016 landscape.
Future Rankings

- The Comfort Of Continuity
- Sam Bradford is relishing the Rams' offensive stability?
Sando »

- There's A Lot To Like
- The SEC boasts a plethora of good, big WRs.
Todd McShay
- Sprow: Where top FPR teams could falter
- Bowen: How to stop Adrian Peterson
- Insider: NFL Future Power Rankings
- Draft Blog: SEC WRs who come up big
- Offseason Grades: AFC | NFC | Kiper on draft

