Mauresmo held up when it mattered most

Justine Henin-Hardenne won the first set of the Wimbledon final in 31 minutes and looked as if she was going to win her first title at the All England Club. Then the second set started and that's where Mary Joe Fernandez and Pam Shriver explain what went wrong, and what Amelie Mauresmo did right.

Updated: July 8, 2006, 3:39 PM ET
By Mary Joe Fernandez and Pam Shriver | Special to ESPN.com

WIMBLEDON, England -- Justine Henin-Hardenne broke top-seeded Amelie Mauresmo's serve twice and cruised to a 6-2 win in the first set in Saturday's Wimbledon final. All indications were that the Belgian was going to cruise to her second straight Grand Slam title in as many months and complete the career Grand Slam.

At that point, here's what ESPN analysts Pam Shriver and Mary Joe Fernandez were thinking:

Shriver: I'm thinking, Brad Gilbert is going to be right. He picked Justine Henin-Hardenne ...

Read full story


You must be signed in to post a comment

Already have an account?