Youthful resolve enough for del Potro
NEW YORK -- Youth will be served. In Roger Federer's case, it probably was inevitable that youth would serve better than he would in a U.S. Open final. Someday arrived on Monday in the form of Juan Martin del Potro.
Scrolling through Federer's championship matchups in Flushing Meadows of the past six years is like watching time-lapse photography. The age gap between him and his opponents widens inexorably, save for the asterisk of 2005, when a 35-year-old Andre Agassi ended a gallant run by taking Federer to four sets.
Don't miss a moment of the latest tennis coverage from around the world. Follow us on Twitter and stay informed. Join »
Federer and Lleyton Hewitt were both 23 when they played for the title in 2004. In 2006, a 25-year-old Federer beat Andy Roddick, a year younger to the month; 2007 and 2008 brought on first-time finalists Novak Djokovic and Andy Murray, each six years younger than Federer. Now comes the next wave.
Del Potro did not win Monday night's final because he was born in Argentina seven years and six weeks after Federer was born in Switzerland. The stat sheet would indicate that he won in part because he landed his first serves in the correct rectangle at the right time -- improving his accuracy with each set and averaging 76 percent during the fourth and fifth to Federer's 53.5 percent. He didn't bomb Federer off the court and was out-aced 13 to 8, but Federer's 11 double faults were a telling symptom of his unease as late afternoon segued to evening.
Youth served better and better as the match went along, and slugged vicious forehands, but there also was something intangible that aided del Potro. He was the guy who finally converted youth to his advantage in this tournament against a brilliantly accomplished elder. He brought strength, mobility and the very bearable lightness of being an underdog who already had declared that the day he clinched a spot in the final was the best day of his life. He was the guy who thought, Wow, I'm hanging in there with Roger Federer, and took competitive heart from that rather than figuring it was good enough for now.
Back and better
Kim Clijsters used to be known for entertaining acrobatics and sketchy nerves. She came back with a clearer head and a cleaner, simpler style. The shots she used to lunge for are now within her reach. She plays with an economy of motion that might be born of pure fitness, but I like to think it's part and parcel of the multitasking moms have to do.
The killjoys among us will say that Clijsters' victory is proof that women's tennis is soft. I would argue that it says more about Clijsters than anyone else. Making it look easy is hard. Beating both Williams sisters in a major -- even if one was partially hobbled and the other helped punch herself out -- is something only a handful of players have done in the past 10 years.
Her coach, Wim Fissette, said he thinks Clijsters is hitting the ball faster than she did a few years ago, and will try to get her to step into the court with more assertiveness, the better to clock her opponents. Her trainer, Sam Verslegers, said she started "at zero'' in terms of conditioning this past January, overweight and unable to run for more than a half hour without pushing her heart rate into the red zone.
But with all due respect, Clijsters didn't start from scratch in a hugely important category: desire. She quit the sport two years ago as a woman who wanted to leave her childhood pursuit of tennis excellence behind. She came back as a woman with childlike eagerness, backed by adult discipline and appreciation for the job. To one of the great ball fetchers of all time, I say this: Great get.-- Bonnie D. Ford
"Got to give him all the credit because it's not an easy thing to do, especially coming out against someone like me with so much experience," Federer said. He added lyrically, "I think it's not easy to have a steel racket."
Like most rookie Grand Slam titlists, del Potro, who will turn 21 on Sept. 23 (he said he will spend part of his winnings on cheesecake for the occasion), didn't know what he didn't know. He didn't know what it would be like to play the quintuple defending champion and Grand Slam record holder in a tournament in which that champion had last lost 2,200 days ago. That didn't matter in the end, because del Potro also didn't know he was supposed to swoon simply because he was there.
There were moments in the match when del Potro appeared overmatched by Federer's swordplay. But every time it looked as if he'd had an arm or a leg lopped off, rather than presenting himself for more punishment like Monty Python's Black Knight, del Potro stopped the bleeding and hammered at Federer with fresh resolve.
"He just did not give up," said Martina Navratilova, who played into her late 40s and knows better than most what it's like to try to stave off youthful determination. "He could have lost the match in three sets, he could have lost it in four, he could have won it in four. But he just kept coming. Very, very strong mentally. I was very impressed."
Coming into the match, del Potro's staying power in a five-setter was a question mark. Endurance was one of the incremental factors that made the difference in the valiant match the two men played in the French Open semifinals. Instead, as was the case in the Australian Open against Rafael Nadal in January, it was Federer's level of play that dropped off in the fifth set as he sprayed 15 unforced errors around the court to del Potro's four.
Unlike the painful trophy ceremony in Melbourne, there were no tears for Federer this time, just a disorienting moment where he cradled the runner-up's hardware next to a man who towered over him. "He seemed very relaxed about [the loss]," Navratilova said. "Who knows? That's the hardest thing, to keep staying motivated."
Federer doesn't look all that much older than del Potro in the photos, just a lot shorter. Yet any champion who says he intends to play into his 30s has to be aware that at some point, youth not only serves better but generally volleys, rallies and recovers better as well. Wisdom, craft and drive will become as important as any shot for him.
"Any time Roger loses in a Slam final, it's going to attract attention -- other guys will see it as another little sign that they can do it, too," said Tennis Channel analyst Leif Shiras. There are a handful of men who might permit themselves to think that way now, and each year from now on there will be more. Tennis is fortunate that Federer can look across the net and find it in himself to want to school them a while longer.
Bonnie D. Ford covers tennis and Olympic sports for ESPN.com. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
2009 U.S. Open
Women's singles: Kim Clijsters, Belgium
Juan Martin del Potro, Argentina
Men's doubles: Lukas Dlouhy, Czech Republic and Leander Paes, India
Women's doubles: Serena and Venus Williams, United States
Mixed doubles: Carly Gullickson and Travis Parrott, United States
Follow us on Twitter
Audio & Video
U.S. Open shop