ESPN

On Wednesday, "First Take" debated Michael Phelps' rank among all athletes. This comes on the heels of Phelps winning his Olympic-record 19th medal in a team event on Tuesday. Skip Bayless wouldn't put him in his top 100 athletes of all time, because of swimming's smaller talent pool compared to, say, basketball. Stephen A. Smith thinks there's something to be said for absolutely dominating your sport in a way that Phelps has, regardless of the competition involved, though he puts Phelps below someone like Carl Lewis. What's your take?

Every four years, Olympic viewers get to see sports that otherwise don't draw much attention. Some seem like a lot of fun -- who doesn't love bouncing on a trampoline? Some, however, look like pure torture. Water polo players swim the entire match and do things that would get you kicked out of the Y. Open-water swimming comes with open-sea hazards (sharks, jellyfish, the Kraken). And what could be more cruel than a race in which you're disqualified for running? So we'll turn it to you: Which non-traditional Olympic sports would you like to try -- or avoid? And which do you enjoy watching? Vote below!

Which of these Olympic sports would you least enjoy trying?

•  
  53%
  10K open water swim
•  
  9%
  Kayaking
•  
  28%
  Race walking
•  
  10%
  Water polo

(Total votes: 4,910)

Which of these Olympic sports would you most enjoy trying?

•  
  24%
  Archery
•  
  36%
  Handball
•  
  21%
  Skeet shooting
•  
  19%
  Trampoline

(Total votes: 4,867)

Which of these non-traditional Olympic sports do you most enjoy viewing?

•  
  24%
  Badminton
•  
  14%
  Fencing
•  
  30%
  Handball
•  
  32%
  Water Polo

(Total votes: 4,807)

Which of these non-traditional sports would you never admit viewing?

•  
  30%
  Dressage (horses, formal outfits)
•  
  29%
  Rhythmic gymnastics (the kind with ribbons, etc.)
•  
  33%
  Synchronized swimming
•  
  8%
  Trampoline

(Total votes: 4,582)

Ryan Lochte has won his latest matchup with Michael Phelps in Olympic qualifiers. Will Lochte top Phelps in London?

• utmcw71689fan: "It's not surprising to see this. Phelps essentially took 3 years off from serious training after Beijing and Lochte has been a training warrior over that same time period."
• PowCsonka: "If I'm Lochte I'm starting to worry. Phelps is closing the gap in a hurry on Lochte's times and could be peaking at the right time, like most of the greatest athletes do, to swoop in and take the prize when it matters most at the Olympics. I would not be willing to bet against Phelps in London."
• John7234797: "Lochte is the best swimmer in the world although Phelps is still great. No way Phelps wins as many Golds as he did in China."
• ejgarnica: "Lochte obviously has been training for this event that Phelps has dominated for the past two Olympics, and Phelps just committed to the event, and so although he lost, taking second place at the trials, you have to consider that Phelps hasn't been training for this even for the past three years, and look where he is now. "
• dnasty3499: "Lochte is just better than Phelps at this event. Mike has no chance at all to ever beat this guy. "
• psahni: "Either way we all win but my money is on Lochte. We don't know if he's peaking or holding back because he's never been this good before let's see in a few weeks. "



Join the conversation or respond by signing in or creating a profile and blogging.